🔗 Share this article

Perhaps some of the most famous photographs from modern history portrays an unclothed girl, her arms spread wide, her features distorted in agony, her flesh blistered and raw. She can be seen dashing towards the camera after escaping an airstrike within the Vietnam War. To her side, other children are fleeing from the bombed village of the region, amid a background of thick fumes and soldiers.

This Global Impact of an Seminal Image

Shortly after the distribution in June 1972, this image—originally titled "Napalm Girl"—evolved into a pre-digital hit. Witnessed and analyzed globally, it's broadly attributed with galvanizing public opinion critical of the American involvement during that era. A prominent author subsequently remarked that the horrifically indelible image featuring the child Kim Phúc in agony likely had a greater impact to heighten popular disgust regarding the hostilities than extensive footage of shown violence. A renowned English documentarian who documented the conflict labeled it the ultimate photo from what would later be called the media war. One more veteran photojournalist declared that the photograph is quite simply, among the most significant photos in history, specifically of that era.

The Long-Standing Claim and a New Allegation

For over five decades, the image was credited to the work of a South Vietnamese photographer, a then-21-year-old South Vietnamese photographer working for an international outlet at the time. But a disputed recent investigation released by a popular platform claims which states the well-known photograph—widely regarded to be the apex of war journalism—might have been taken by another person at the location during the attack.

According to the film, The Terror of War was actually photographed by a stringer, who offered the images to the organization. The allegation, along with the documentary's resulting research, originates with a man named an ex-staffer, who alleges that a dominant photo chief directed him to reassign the photo's byline from the freelancer to Nick Út, the one employed photographer on site during the incident.

This Quest for the Real Story

Robinson, currently elderly, reached out to one of the journalists in 2022, requesting help to locate the unknown stringer. He mentioned that, if he could be found, he wanted to offer an apology. The investigator considered the independent photographers he knew—seeing them as modern freelancers, just as Vietnamese freelancers in that era, are frequently marginalized. Their contributions is commonly doubted, and they function in far tougher circumstances. They have no safety net, no long-term security, minimal assistance, they often don’t have good equipment, and they remain highly exposed as they capture images in their own communities.

The journalist asked: How would it feel for the man who captured this photograph, if indeed he was not the author?” From a photographic perspective, he imagined, it would be deeply distressing. As a follower of photojournalism, especially the highly regarded combat images from that war, it could prove earth-shattering, maybe reputation-threatening. The respected legacy of the image within the diaspora was so strong that the creator with a background fled during the war was hesitant to engage with the project. He said, I hesitated to unsettle this long-held narrative that credited Nick the photograph. And I didn’t want to disrupt the current understanding of a community that always respected this accomplishment.”

The Investigation Progresses

Yet both the journalist and his collaborator agreed: it was worth raising the issue. When reporters must hold everybody else responsible,” remarked the investigator, we must are willing to ask difficult questions about our own field.”

The investigation tracks the journalists as they pursue their inquiry, including discussions with witnesses, to requests in present-day Saigon, to archival research from additional films taken that day. Their work eventually yield a candidate: a freelancer, a driver for a television outlet during the attack who sometimes sold photographs to international news outlets on a freelance basis. As shown, a moved the man, like others in his 80s based in the United States, claims that he sold the famous picture to the news organization for minimal payment and a copy, but was plagued without recognition over many years.

This Backlash Followed by Ongoing Scrutiny

The man comes across in the film, quiet and calm, yet his account proved controversial in the world of journalism. {Days before|Shortly prior to